Governance
Know what happened. Every action can be logged with the relevant user, workflow, timestamp and AI version. Changes are traceable. Outputs are reviewable. Records can be reconstructed.
MA Technologies LLC — Governed AI
AI built for regulated clinical workflows — with governance, privacy, human oversight and auditability built in.
Source → versioned skill → human review → approved output
The problem
Coordinators paste protocol sections into whatever tool is open. The output is useful. What is missing is everything a regulated organization depends on afterwards.
What it is
The protocol and its source documents enter a study workspace.
A versioned workflow produces a structured draft.
A named person reviews and accepts, or sends it back.
Source, skill version, run, artifact, and reviewer stay linked.
It deliberately does not replace your CTMS, EDC, eTMF, or any clinical decision system. It sits alongside them and governs the document work that currently happens outside all of them.
The four pillars
Know what happened. Every action can be logged with the relevant user, workflow, timestamp and AI version. Changes are traceable. Outputs are reviewable. Records can be reconstructed.
Built with regulated workflows in mind. Our architecture is designed to support controls relevant to HIPAA, 21 CFR Part 11 and GxP environments — access controls, electronic records, electronic signatures, audit trails and validation. Not bolted on after deployment.
Your patient data stays protected. We design workflows around controlled data access, least-privilege permissions, and secure handling of sensitive information. HIPAA's Security Rule specifically addresses the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic PHI.
AI can assist. People stay accountable. Define what AI can do on its own, where human review is required and when an action needs escalation. A person clicking “Approve” isn't necessarily meaningful oversight.
Capabilities
Organization, client, project, study, and location hierarchy so every piece of work happens inside a protocol-bound context.
Prompt, code, and hybrid skills with metadata, lifecycle states, lineage, and retained versions. Workflows become managed assets, not personal prompts.
Asynchronous jobs with status tracking and timeout handling, so long document work runs reliably instead of being retried by hand.
PDF, DOCX, XLSX and other source documents uploaded to object storage and extracted for use — no email chains or desktop handoffs.
Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF and schema-versioned JSON from a single run: deliverables people can use and structured results systems can read.
Every AI output stays a draft. Reviewer and timestamp fields, blocked QA states, and clear AI-draft labeling keep a person accountable.
Invocations, administrative actions, and internal data access are recorded so you can reconstruct how a given document came to exist.
Sponsor, site, and internal roles with scoped visibility across clients, studies, and locations — including what internal staff can see.
Designed to run inside your boundary, with configurable data controls and PHI-minimization requirements rather than a shared tenant you cannot inspect.
Use cases
Each one is a versioned workflow bound to the protocol, producing a draft for human review — not an answer presented as fact.
Governance and control
AI output is labeled as draft and cannot pass as final without a named reviewer.
The exact workflow version behind a document is retained, not overwritten.
Source file, skill version, run, and reviewer stay connected.
Access is scoped by client, study, and location, including internally.
PHI minimization and redaction are treated as configuration, not an afterthought.
The workspace can be deployed within your own environment boundary.
These are engineering and process controls we implement and hand over. They are not a certification, and we do not present them as one. Where a deployment needs validation evidence, that is scoped and delivered as part of the engagement.
How we engage
Two to three weeks, fixed fee. We map the documents your teams produce, where unmanaged AI is already being used, and the record you need to keep.
One protocol, one or two sites, three to five skills. A working proof point with real source documents and real reviewers, on a fixed fee.
Deployment into your environment, with the evidence, procedures, and configuration work your quality function will ask for.
New workflows built, versioned, and maintained as protocols and standard operating procedures change.
Beyond clinical research
Clinical research is where this is most developed, and where we start. The same governed pattern applies to financial services recordkeeping, privacy-intensive enterprises, and quality-regulated life sciences functions outside the trial itself.
Those are engagements we take on individually, with their own regulatory mapping.
Briefing
A short document covering the architecture, the control model, what a pilot looks like, and the questions to ask before letting AI near protocol material. Written for clinical operations and quality leaders.
We use your details to send the briefing and follow up once. Nothing else.